Kan & Company

Marketing for results

Home » Opinion

Opinion

What’s the difference between marketing and sales?

Some people think Marketing is just advertising and promotions. But it’s so much more. Others think that they know how to do sales and therefore they can “do marketing.”

Marketing and sales are two distinct but interrelated functions in a business. Marketing involves identifying, understanding, and satisfying the needs and wants of potential and existing customers, while sales involves persuading and convincing them to buy the products or services that the business offers. Marketing and sales work together to create value for both the customers and the business.

Marketing encompasses a wide range of activities, such as market research, product development, pricing, distribution, promotion, branding, and customer relationship management. Marketing aims to create awareness, interest, desire, and action among the target market segments. Marketing also helps to establish the positioning, differentiation, and competitive advantage of the business in the marketplace.

Sales, on the other hand, focuses on closing deals and generating revenue for the business. Sales involves contacting, qualifying, presenting, negotiating, and closing with the prospects and customers. Sales also involves providing after-sales service and support to ensure customer satisfaction and loyalty. Sales relies on the leads and prospects generated by marketing to convert them into paying customers.

The difference between marketing and sales can be summarized as follows: marketing is about creating demand, while sales is about fulfilling demand. Marketing is about attracting customers, while sales is about retaining customers. Marketing is about communicating value, while sales is about delivering value. Marketing is a long-term strategic process, while sales is a short-term tactical process.

0

Combining the roles of board chair and CEO

Combining the roles of board chairperson and chief executive can have several benefits for an organization, such as:

  • Enhancing strategic alignment and vision. Having one person in charge of both the board and the executive team can ensure that the organization’s strategy and vision are consistent and coherent, and that the board and the executive team are working towards the same goals.
  • Improving decision-making and accountability. Having one person responsible for both the board and the executive team can facilitate faster and more effective decision-making, as well as clearer accountability for the outcomes. The combined leader can also communicate more directly and transparently with the stakeholders, such as shareholders, employees, customers, and regulators.
  • Reducing costs and complexity. Having one person hold both roles can reduce the costs and complexity of having two separate leaders, such as salaries, benefits, travel expenses, office space, etc. It can also simplify the governance structure and avoid potential conflicts or duplication of roles and responsibilities.
  • Bringing better board visibility. Usually a board expects a CEO to have thought through an issue and presented the board with a solution and a recommendation before it is brought before them. On the other hand, members of the board have a duty and responsibility to keep the board informed of issues and risks as soon as they become aware of them. This means that an Executive Chair should bring issues to the board before they have been fully worked through, giving the board real time awareness of the issue and its resolution.

However, combining the roles of board chairperson and chief executive also has some drawbacks and risks, such as:

  • Concentrating too much power and influence in one person. Having one person control both the board and the executive team can create a situation where there is a lack of checks and balances, independent oversight, or constructive challenge. This can lead to potential issues such as groupthink, tunnel vision, ethical lapses, or abuse of power.
  • Increasing the workload and stress for the combined leader. Having one person handle both roles can create a heavy workload and stress for the combined leader, who has to balance multiple demands and expectations from different stakeholders. This can affect the leader’s performance, health, well-being, or succession planning.
  • Reducing diversity and representation on the board. Having one person occupy both roles can reduce the diversity and representation on the board, especially if the combined leader is from a dominant or privileged group. This can limit the board’s ability to reflect the interests and perspectives of different stakeholders, such as minority shareholders, employees, customers, or communities.

Therefore, combining the roles of board chairperson and chief executive is not a one-size-fits-all solution for every organization. It depends on various factors such as the size, nature, culture, strategy, performance, challenges, opportunities, and stakeholder expectations of the organization. It also requires careful consideration of the potential benefits and drawbacks, as well as appropriate safeguards and mechanisms to mitigate the risks.

0

How to write an RFP for technology systems

A request for proposal (RFP) is a document that solicits proposals from potential vendors for a project or service. An RFP typically outlines the scope, objectives, deliverables, timeline, budget, evaluation criteria and submission requirements of the project. An RFP is an important tool for selecting the best vendor for a technology system that is mission critical and is a significant procurement for your organisation or business.

An ideal RFP for such a system should have the following components:

– Executive summary: This section provides a brief overview of the organization, its mission, vision and goals, and the purpose and scope of the RFP. It should also highlight the main benefits and challenges of the project, and the expected outcomes and impacts.

– Background and context: This section provides relevant information about the organization’s current situation, needs, problems and opportunities. It should also describe the existing technology system, its limitations and gaps, and the desired features and functionalities of the new system.

– Project description: This section defines the scope and objectives of the project, and the specific deliverables and requirements that the vendor must meet. It should also specify the timeline, milestones, deliverables and acceptance criteria for each phase of the project.

– Budget and payment terms: This section indicates the available budget for the project, and the expected payment terms and schedule. It should also state whether the budget is fixed or flexible, and whether there are any incentives or penalties for performance.

– Evaluation criteria and process: This section describes how the proposals will be evaluated and scored, and what factors will be considered in the selection process. It should also outline the steps and timeline of the evaluation process, and the roles and responsibilities of the evaluation committee.

– Proposal format and submission instructions: This section provides detailed instructions on how to prepare and submit a proposal, including the format, structure, content, length and language of the proposal. It should also specify the deadline, mode and address of submission, and any other relevant information or documents that must be included with the proposal.

An ideal RFP for a technology system that costs hundreds of thousands of dollars should be clear, concise, comprehensive and consistent. It should also be realistic, feasible and aligned with the organization’s goals and needs. An ideal RFP should attract qualified vendors who can offer innovative solutions that meet or exceed the expectations of the organization.

0

Writing the technical requirements for your RFP

A request for proposal (RFP) is a document that solicits bids from potential vendors for a project or service. One of the most important components of an RFP is the technical requirements section, which defines the specifications and standards that the proposed technology system must meet. Developing the technical requirements for an RFP can be a challenging task, especially for a large and complex system that costs hundreds of thousands of dollars. Here are some steps to help you write a clear and comprehensive technical requirements section for your RFP.

1. Define the scope and objectives of the project. Before you start writing the technical requirements, you need to have a clear understanding of what the project aims to achieve, what problems it intends to solve, and what benefits it will bring to your organization. You should also identify the key stakeholders, users, and decision-makers involved in the project, and their roles and expectations.

2. Conduct a needs assessment and gap analysis. A needs assessment is a process of identifying and prioritizing the current and future needs of your organization in relation to the technology system. A gap analysis is a process of comparing your current state with your desired state, and identifying the gaps or deficiencies that need to be addressed by the new system. You can use various methods to conduct a needs assessment and gap analysis, such as surveys, interviews, focus groups, observations, document reviews, etc.

3. Define the functional and non-functional requirements. Functional requirements describe what the system should do, such as the features, functions, capabilities, and processes that it should support. Non-functional requirements describe how the system should perform, such as the quality attributes, performance criteria, security standards, reliability measures, etc. You should write the functional and non-functional requirements in clear, concise, and measurable terms, using a standard format such as user stories or use cases.

4. Define the technical specifications and standards. Technical specifications describe the technical aspects of the system, such as the hardware, software, network, data, integration, interoperability, compatibility, etc. that it should use or comply with. Technical standards describe the industry best practices, regulations, policies, guidelines, etc. that the system should follow or adhere to. You should write the technical specifications and standards in detail, using diagrams, tables, charts, etc. to illustrate them.

5. Review and validate the technical requirements. Before you finalize the technical requirements section of your RFP, you should review it for accuracy, completeness, consistency, clarity, feasibility, and alignment with your project scope and objectives. You should also validate it with your stakeholders, users, decision-makers, and subject matter experts to ensure that it meets their needs and expectations. You should solicit feedback from them and incorporate any changes or improvements as needed.

0

Putting together RFP technical requirements from vendor demos

Creating the technical requirements for an expensive technology system from the features of different products from competing vendors is a risky endeavor that can lead to several problems. Some of the risks are:

– Incompatibility: The features of different products may not work well together or may require additional integration efforts. This can result in increased costs, delays, and errors in the system implementation and operation.

– Redundancy: The features of different products may overlap or duplicate each other, leading to unnecessary complexity and waste of resources. This can also affect the system performance and reliability.

– Inconsistency: The features of different products may have different standards, specifications, or quality levels. This can create confusion and conflicts among the system stakeholders and users, as well as compromise the system functionality and security.

– Obsolescence: The features of different products may become outdated or irrelevant over time, as the technology landscape changes and evolves. This can reduce the system value and competitiveness, and require frequent updates or replacements.

To avoid these risks, it is advisable to conduct a thorough analysis of the system needs and objectives, and to select the most suitable products or vendors that can meet them. It is also important to establish clear and consistent criteria for evaluating and comparing the features of different products, and to document the technical requirements in a detailed and structured way.

0